<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bach Seat &#187; Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/category/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rbach.net/blog</link>
	<description>The view from where I am sitting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time to Review Corporate Computer Policies</title>
		<link>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/time-to-review-corporate-computer-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/time-to-review-corporate-computer-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Fraud and Abuse Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbach.net/blog/?p=2019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Law Journal is reporting that three recent court decisions make it important for companies to begin a thorough review of their computer-use policies. The National Law Journal suggests firms focus on two issues: ensuring that employees have no expectation of privacy in using the company computer systems and delineating the scope of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/time-to-review-corporate-computer-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan Troopers Downloading Phone Data Without Warrants?</title>
		<link>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/michigan-troopers-downloading-phone-data-without-warrants-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/michigan-troopers-downloading-phone-data-without-warrants-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan State Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think about this while you are driving around this Memorial Day weekend. &#8211; The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan claims that for several years now Michigan State Police have been using portable devices that allow them to secretly extract personal information from cell phones. In an a article on Help Net Security the ACLU [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/michigan-troopers-downloading-phone-data-without-warrants-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More WLAN Legal Wrangling</title>
		<link>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/more-wlan-legal-wrangling/</link>
		<comments>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/more-wlan-legal-wrangling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbach.net/blog/?p=3799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wireless patent wars wage on. Ericsson, (NASDAQ : ERIC) the Swedish telecommunications giant has filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against a number of companies for alleged patents infringement of its IEEE 802.11 wireless products reports CENS.com. CENS.com says the businesses named  in the Ericsson&#8217;s lawsuit include: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/more-wlan-legal-wrangling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Suing Whom in the Telecom World?</title>
		<link>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/whos-suing-whom-in-the-telecom-world/</link>
		<comments>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/whos-suing-whom-in-the-telecom-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infograhic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIMM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbach.net/blog/?p=4129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Information is Beautiful has a great infographic showing the current state of telecommunications lawsuits.  David McCandless at Information is Beautiful includes snippets of each law suit, which is helpful for understanding the overall picture. The diagram differentiates between ongoing and finished lawsuits with different arrows, while the size of the cubes represent the various company’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/whos-suing-whom-in-the-telecom-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Email Policy</title>
		<link>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/update-email-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/update-email-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rbach.net/blog/?p=2531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court case coming out of New Jersey could impact most firms’ privacy and security practices according to an article on DarkReading. The New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled in Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc., 408 N.J.Super. 54, 973 A.2d 390 (Superior Ct., A.D. 2009) that an employer can not read email messages sent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rbach.net/blog/index.php/update-email-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

