Tag Archive for Networking

Brocade Selling Itself

network ChannelInsider citing the Wall Street Journal is  reporting that network equipment maker Brocade Communications Systems Inc. put itself up for sale on 10-05-09. The paper, citing people familiar with the matter, said Oracle Corp and Hewlett-Packard Co were potential bidders for the company, but a deal was not imminent and Brocade may not even go ahead with a sale. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison told investors at Oracle’s annual shareholder conference Wednesday. “We have no interest in buying Brocade,”  in response to a question from an investor according to Fortune.

brocadeTo compete with much bigger rival Cisco Systems Inc, the company has been bolstering sales partnerships with large technology vendors such as IBM and Dell Inc to expand their customer reach. In an interview with Reuters last month, Brocade Chief Executive Michael Klayko had said he did not see a need for Brocade to merge with or acquire another company, citing the company’s expertise and partnerships. However, “Interest in Brocade is picking up, and it is unlikely the company put itself up for sale in the absence of third-party interest,” according to Goldman Sachs analyst Min Park. “Brocade is a likely strategic fit for a number of potential acquirers.” At Fortune, Park includes Hewlett Packard, Juniper, Dell, IBM  and Oracle among those.

rb-

It is unlikely that Dell will purchase Brocade since Dell has Perot Systems to digest and a sales partnership with Brocade. Iuniper is not in the financial postion, but is the most need of the product. IBM is financailly cpable but the hardware business seems to be losing focus at Big Blue. That leaves HP  for three reasons, first it is financially capable, second it is looking to grow its ProCurve business and its EDS acquisition is well underway. The wild card could be Huawei, if they can get government approval. Of course, Brocade CEO Mike Klayko, just may have needed some extra pocket money as the Wall Street Journal article triggering a 14 percent jump in the company’s shares. Mr. Klayko’s $5 million in options increased by $700,000 in one day.

Smart Grid needs IPv6

ipv6 Cisco Systems is looking at IPv6 as a  a critical component in securing the next-generation electricity distribution system.   IPv6 is attractive to the Smart Grid initiative for two reason, the first being an abundance of IP addresses available in the expanded 128-bit address space for all the gizmos they hope to sell in a market which Cisco pegs at $20 billion a year. “IPv6 is an interesting discussion and one that occupies a lot of bandwidth at Cisco,” Marie Hattar, Cisco’s vice president of network systems ciscoand security solutions marketing, told InternetNews.com. “Some people say that for smaller deployments, we could get away with IPv4, but the smart grid has a number of parts.”

The second benefit to the Smart Grid is the security features in IPv6 which will add a layer of protection to the vulnerable electric grid management systems.  Security is also now top of mind as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now investigating a report into potential threats to the West Coast power grid. Earlier this year, widely circulated reports noted that foreign entities—presumably from China—infiltrated the U.S. power grid on several occasions and have the ability to disrupt power distribution.

At the 2009  Black Hat security conference, a security researcher detailed security vulnerabilities in smart grid meters. “If you think about hacking into a smart meter, it’s like hacking into your TV’s remote control — you still get your TV,” Hattar said. “The meters are a reporting mechanism but it’s not going to affect the electrical system.” Still, Hattar added that smart meter vendors are concerned about security and Cisco will work with them. “A key part is to build out an end-to-end framework that is secure,” Hattar said. “A lot has to do with isolation and not exposing the grid to points of entry that are hackable.”

“As utilities are looking to build out smart grid, it’s more effective to agree on a common protocol across the board as opposed to trying intermix different ones,”  Hatter says, “In many ways, this is like the early days of the Internet where we ultimately settled on IP. We see IP as the scalable protocol for smart grid and we’re working with a variety of vendors to advocate this and make this the key protocol of choice.”

Cisco is among the numerous IT vendors with initiatives for improving the power grid.  IBM is working with several of its partners on power grid issues through its Smart Planet program.

There’s likely to be subsidiary benefits to the smart grid, like furthering the cause of IPv6  since since tens of millions of users and new devices around the world will require connectivity. For example, with utilities adopting IP-enabled metering for thousands of homes connected to the network, there could be an issue with addressing over IPv4. On IPv6, thanks to its plentiful address availability, there are no addressing issues.

rb-

Not only is this a technological issue, but it is an energy policy issue. An electrical grid which can support Smart meters, will allow energy producers to better control the flow of electricity, which will increase the efficiency of the electrical grid, which will in turn decrease our dependence on fossil fuels. America needs to get off of electrical generation by fossil fuels and the this technology can speed the process, before it is to late and gasoline reaches $7.00 a gallon making the current recession seem like a walk in the park.

802.11n Ratified -Yawn

wifiReuters is reporting that today (09-11-09) the IEEE Standards Board has ratified the IEEE 802.11n™-2009 amendment. This vote ends a seven year effort to, “enable rollout of significantly more scalable WLANs that deliver 10-fold-greater data rates than previously defined while ensuring co-existence with legacy systems and security implementations” according the the IEEE. The 560-page document is scheduled to be published in mid-October 2009. Bruce Kraemer, Chair of the IEEE Wireless LAN Working Group said in a press release “The performance improvements achieved via IEEE 802.11n stand to transform the WLANieee_logo user experience, and ratification of the amendment sets the stage for a new wave of application innovation and creation of new market opportunities.”

Kelly Davis-Felner, marketing director of the Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA), told Network World that “The core interoperability is totally preserved with the [existing] draft certification program.”  Ms. Davis-Felner says,  ”Existing draft-11n products should work seamlessly with future products based on the final standard. No existing products will have to be retested in the updated certification program.”

Today’s ratification marks the high-point for other 802.11 wireless products. This approval will green-light the development and deployment of 11n products in the enterprise. There is no longer a reason for firms deploying greenfield WLAN’s to roll put anything but  802.11n.   The WFA expects  11n shipments to rise to 45% of all 802.11 shipments in 2009, and 60% in 2012 based on data from market researcher ABI Research, according to Davis-Felner. But how long will 802.11n last?

wigigNetworkWorld is reporting that Microsoft, Intel and other manufacturers have formed the  Gigabit Wireless Alliance (WiGig) to create anew wireless specification with a data speed of up to 6Gbps. WiGig is also actively involved with the IEEE’s 802.11ad task group. And if WiGig is to slow, James Buckwalter, a professor at the University of California San Diego has developed s a silicon-based amplifier that transmits 10Gbps wireless in 100 GHz frequency bands  according to NetworkWorld. Coverage could also be over a kilometer, which beats traditional WiFi’s 100 meters.

rb-WiFi abgn logo

The formal ratification of the IEEE 802.11n standard is a good thing. However we have been recommending that clients seriously consider this technology in greenfield installs with Wi-Fi approved 802.11n since the beginning of the year.

Feds Still Aim to Federalize Net

securitySenator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) has released a revised version of his bill that would federalize the Internet (I covered this topic earlier here ). The current draft would allow the president to “declare a cyber security emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Section 3 (2) (B) Defines “Cyber” as any matter relating to, or involving the use of, computers or computer networks. Section 201 (2) (B), permits the president to “direct the national response to the cyber threat” if necessary for “the national defense and security.”

“I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness,” Larry Clinton told CNET “It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill.” said Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board.

Senator Rockefeller

A Senate source familiar with the bill told CNET that the president’s power to take control of portions of the Internet is comparable to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.

Section 201 (5) the bill requires the White House to engage in “periodic mapping” of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies “shall share” requested information with the federal government. The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco told CNET . “As soon as you’re saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it’s going to be a really big issue,” he says.

“The language has changed but it doesn’t contain any real additional limits,” EFF’s Tien says. “It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)…The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There’s no provision for any administrative process or review. That’s where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.”

Rb-

If your network is determined to be “critical” by the Feds, there is likely a new set of regulations coming from the same people who are giving themselves failing grades for their own cyber-security. These new rules could impact staffing decisions, disclosure policies and open the door to a government can take over your IT systems. This bill requires watching by anybody that uses or manages computers, a private network or the Internet. It is likely they will sweep it in as pork on sort other unrelated bill, to limit public discussion.

Contact your representatives in DC.

Internet Over the Hill

BirthdayThe Internet is 40 years old. On September 2nd 1969, in a lab at the University of California, Los Angeles, two computers passed test data through a 15-foot gray cable. The network became known as ARPANET. Stanford Research Institute joined the network a month later followed by UC Santa Barbara and the University of Utah by year’s end, and the Internet was born.

National Geographic has a video for the party  Happy Birthday Internet

Switch to our mobile site