Tag Archive for Politics

Who’s in Charge Here?

Apparently the justices in the U.S.’s highest court don’t use much technology. LawyersUSA reports that during oral arguments in the case City of Ontario v. Quon, which considers whether police officers had an expectation of privacy in personal (and sexually explicit) text messages sent on pagers issued to them by the city, the justices of the Supreme Court at times seemed to struggle with the technology involved.

Among the technical difficulties reported included Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. – who is known to write out his opinions in long hand with pen and paper instead of a computer – asked what the difference was “between email and a pager?”

Justice Anthony Kennedy asked what would happen if a text message was sent to an officer at the same time he was sending one to someone else. “Does it say: ‘Your call is important to us, and we will get back to you?’” Kennedy asked.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrangled a bit with the idea of a service provider. “You mean (the text) doesn’t go right to me?” he asked. Then he asked whether they can be printed out in hard copy. “Could Quon print these spicy little conversations and send them to his buddies?” Scalia asked.

rb-

While I’m no lawyer, I have a passing knowledge of how courts work (and don’t work) to frame decisions I make. It would seem reasonable that the Supremes would have a passing knowledge of how technology works when they are making law that will impact the rest of us.

No Job Growth for 10 Years

recessionThe New York Times is reporting that for  the first time since the Depression, the American economy has added virtually no jobs in the private sector over a 10-year period. The total number of jobs has grown a bit, but that is only because of government hiring.

The NYT charts show the job performance from July 1999, through July of this year. For the decade, there was a net gain of 121,000 private sector jobs, according to the survey of employers conducted each month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In an economy with 109 million such jobs, that indicated an annual growth rate for the 10 years of 0.01 percent.

According to the NYT, until the current downturn, the long-term annual growth rate for private sector jobs had not dipped below 1 percent since the early 1960s. Most often, the rate was well above that.

NYT chart

NYT chart

Fortunately for me the NYT says the field of management and technical consulting leaped at an annual rate of 5 percent. But while designing computers and related equipment was a growth field, building them was a very different story, as the manufacturing shifted largely to Asia. The number of jobs making computer and electronic equipment in the United States fell at an annual rate of 4.4 percent, substantially more than the overall decline in manufacturing jobs, of 3.7 percent.

That was a better showing than that of the automakers, which shed jobs at a rate of 6.7 percent a year. By contrast, auto dealers cut jobs at a much slower rate of 1.3 percent a year, although that rate may accelerate later this year as General Motors and Chrysler dealerships are closed.

The total picture is of an economy that has changed in substantial ways over the decade. After the recession ends, job growth is likely to resume. But there is no indication that the secular trend toward a more service-oriented economy will reverse. and few expect that manufacturing will reverse its long decline as a major employer in the United States.

rb-

Enough said

Feds to Nationalize Private Networks

securityIn the tradition of federalization of the auto industry, and in keeping with promises made in the 2008 campaign, the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress are proposing to increase cybersecurity by federalizing computer security. The legislation, co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John D.”The Internet Should Never Have Existed” Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) and Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine), was drafted with White House input.

The Rockefeller-Snowe measure would create the Office of the National Cybersecurity Adviser, the White House cyber security “czar.”  The czar would report directly to the president and would coordinate defense efforts across government agencies. The proposed bills go beyond securing government networks and puts the White House in charge of the security of private networks with authority to shut them down.  Under the guise of “critical infrastructure”, the Feds are going to nationalize banking, utilities, air/rail/auto traffic control and telecommunications networks.

The new rules are proposed in two senate bills, S.773 the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S.778 . S.778 is a a bill to establish, within the Executive Office of the President, the Office of National Cybersecurity Advisor.  S.773 is “A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes.”

It would require the National Institute of Standards and Technology to establish “measurable and auditable cybersecurity standards” that would apply to private companies as well as the government. It also would require licensing and certification of cybersecurity professionals.

Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair acknowledged there will be privacy concerns about centralizing cybersecurity, and he told the Washington Post that the program should be designed in a way that gives Americans confidence that it is “not being used to gather private information.”

rb- How does the Obama Cyber Czar plan to ensure the continued free flow of commerce when they take the Telco networks off-line. In case they haven’t noticed, the Telco’s provide most of the long-haul interconnect for the Internet. If the Obama Cyber Czar decides to take the banks offline, there are going to be bigger problems, can you say bank run? I will pull my cash out at the local branch.

Finally this is bad policy, because the Security Czar is a political appointment and network security is to important to be left to politics, unless of course it is in the corporate boardroom.

Switch to our mobile site